From ST.
April 17, 2005
TOP OF THE NEWS
Casinos can create 10,000 jobs
By Asad Latif
UP TO 10,000 jobs could be created if Singapore allows two resorts with casinos at Marina Bay and Sentosa.
That is labour chief Lim Boon Heng's estimate, based on what he saw during a recent trip to Macau.
'Hypothetically, if we have one at Marina Bay and one at Sentosa, then direct employment, I'll say up to 10,000. Indirect employment - shops, hotels elsewhere - I think several more thousands,' he said.
'That is not insignificant for us because, at the moment, we do have an unemployment problem.'
About 78,600 Singapore residents were unemployed at the end of last year. Without a casino, Mr Lim said, it was unlikely Singapore would be able to boost tourism to the levels needed to create those 10,000 jobs.
'I don't like gambling. I wish we don't have to have a casino but if we can revitalise our tourism and hospitality sector with only one, then maybe it is a price that we have to consider.'
Mr Lim's comments come a day after Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew indicated at a forum that Singapore could no longer afford to say 'no' to a casino.
The Government is widely expected to give the go-ahead to at least one casino when it announces its decision tomorrow after a year-long debate on the pros and cons of allowing gaming here.
Yesterday, Mr Lim, who is secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress, re-angled the debate. The issue at stake is not the casino per se, he said, but about how Singapore should revitalise its economy for the future.
In recent years, many less-skilled workers from the manufacturing sector have lost their jobs as firms relocated to lower-cost countries.
Many of these workers lack the skills needed for the new manufacturing jobs being created, so jobs must be found for them in the services sector, he said.
Singapore has developed itself as a hub for air, transhipment and financial services but many countries are now pursuing the same strategy. This leaves Singapore to 'play a defensive game in maintaining our jobs' in the services sector.
'So changes have taken place in SIA and the airport but we need a more active programme of revitalising the services sector so that we will have more jobs,' Mr Lim said.
And this means taking steps to draw in more tourists. One way to do so is to build an integrated resort that includes theme parks, museums and shows, or host events that draw big crowds such as Formula One races and international sports tournaments.
'So the debate should be over job creation,' said Mr Lim, who is also Minister in the Prime Minister's Office. 'The problem is: Can we do all this without a casino?
'Those who want to develop this facility say that they will invest big money if they are given a casino licence. So we have to weigh that factor carefully.'
He also said that NTUC uses earnings from jackpot machines to subsidise its clubs to the tune of $1 million each a year.
Elsewhere, at an event at Rosyth School, Education Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam was also addressing the casino debate.
He said if Singapore wants to become a leading global city 10 to 15 years from now, new attitudes towards governing and being willing to try new things would be required.
But the core of society must be preserved: 'The fact that we are conservative, value the family, value hard work and thrift.'
Additional reporting by Sarah Ng
End
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-
My take? just go ahead la.. Just look at how ST actively portraits the "goodness" of casino. lots of advertising space i say. MM Lee, the old man himself has given his blessings to casino. And as expected, Mr Lim Boon Heng has to support support abit lah. Labour chief leh.. just one day difference, and all the statistics can be out. two casinos some more. wah. i think if i'm unemployed, can i get a job that fast. so you guys know how to keep yourself in job lar.
and being a minister is really not easy, you have to sell blood, not quite literally at times, go against your own good nature to accept casino. so noble. sure get more votes in coming election. even if less than half of singapore gets to vote.
Just look at the headlines, up to 10,000 jobs, wah. like some sale like that, more than $10,000 prizes to be won, only to find out that top prize is only $2000, and the rest are in discount coupons which only valid till next month and shared with 1000 other winners (losers). the best part is that you have to spend more than $2000 to get the chance to win. worth it.
the catch is that we must have 2 casinos to create "up to" that number of job, but what was not said is who are the jobs for. Singaporeans or foreign alike? so theortically one casino can create 5000 jobs lar; that's only 0.63% of the unemployed in singapore leh. very helpful hor?
if Mr Lim is right about his overnight statistics, i say why not just create 20 casinos? one in every GRC, (sorry opposition ones will have to wait like MRT and sheltered walk ways), not euough GRCs? draw new one (again) lar, the oppositions can take places with good view like kusu island mah. anyway, that will create 20 x 5000 jobs! wah. though not as many as the cows in new zealand, singaporeans can be employed for life man, 100,000 jobs leh... that is what i call a true hub.
we can also have a school, SG Pool of gambling policy, like one of those schools recently opened.. named after someone.. cant remember. To ensure that singapore gambling can remain top in asia. NTUC can also expand its reach to continue its effort in protecting singaporean by setting up a new credit services to gamblers, why borrow from loan sharks and get free pig's head when you have big NTUC protecting you. anyway, police are getting tough on loan sharks, so there must have to be a better way to get money. what perfect timing. i would love to invest in loan shark business, but now, sigh..
but freak, casino or not, it has been in the road map of our ever capable government. i mean, if a reservoir idea at kallang basin needs twenty years to hatch. surely our government could have thought about the idea of casino long time ago right? i don't know, but sounded logical to me.
Otherwise, who would be so nice to culture us bit by bit by increasing the number of days we could bet 4D from two to three days, increase the stake in big sweep from 1M to 2M, include local and even oversea soccer matches, sell tikam scratch and rebrand singapore pool into the most modern, younger and more appealing icon of singapore gambling industry. oh, there is only one icon.
with so many days and games to gambling, how can we argue with statistics (now) when our own government (again) says that even with casino (never say one or two or N) only 2% will be problematic? 0.63% saved, 2% condemned, don't sound like good business investments to me leh. How to break even like that?
Everyday for the past few years, we have been paving the way to casino ourselves. when we (may) have the say to increased number of bets and games and did nothing, why should casino be a problem now right?
every clever signaporean who got a knee-cap which can think will know of tomorrow's outcome from PM Lee, i mean, MM Lee mentors the ministers liao, who can don't listen? We always listen to our daddy right? ouch.
chill. pissed.